Note: You are seeing this message either because your browser has not loaded our stylesheets, or because your browser does not support stylesheets (CSS). Please upgrade to a relatively modern browser to improve your experience. Not sure what to upgrade to? Try Firefox.
The Science Advisory Board
Screen Name: 
 
Password: 
 

SAB News

True Confessions
Posted 8/9/2005

Professional regrets, personal regrets. We all have them. Sometimes they get buried under the demands of daily life only to resurface years later upon reflection. However, people can often learn from theirs and others’ “mistakes of hindsight” if examined when there is still time to make a difference. It is in this altruistic spirit that The Science Advisory Board polled its members about what actions (or inactions) they most regretted in their careers.

Garnering 44% of the vote, job position ranked as the most significant determinant in predicting a scientists’ degree of satisfaction with his or her career choice. More than twice as many people regret taking a specific job than not taking a specific job. “While this finding may appear counter intuitive due to the “grass is always greener” phenomenon, it most likely indicates that people have become disillusioned with their current positions for a variety of reasons,” explains Tamara Zemlo, Ph.D., MPH, Executive Director of The Science Advisory Board.

When it comes to which direction one’s research should take, it is abundantly clear that the vast majority of scientists (98%) do not have any second thoughts about the experiments they have conducted. However, one-fifth of researchers do regret not performing that one critical experiment. This frustration encompasses scientists hoping to compensate for a lack of data, inconclusive data, or misleading data.

When it comes to networking and collaborations, most scientists are equally divided between whether they should have or should not have taken advice from their colleagues. Whether or not they attended a particular conference or not is pretty inconsequential in the scheme of things to the majority of scientists, although twice as many of them do wish they had gone to a particular conference.

This mini study suggests that while scientists feel like they have a lot of control over their own destinies, they are not convinced they always make the right decisions when it comes to selecting their jobs and experiments to perform.

Scientific & Medical
Experts Needed!

The Science Advisory Board is the world's most established network of life scientists!

Voice your opinions on companies, products, protocols and even humor in a lively, real-time, interactive Online Community of over 40,000 life science & medical professionals.

Redeem generous rewards for participation in studies, contributing website content and referring colleagues.

Join Right Now!
(It's Free!)

Search This Site
only search scienceboard.net
only search Forums
What's this?